Hi!
It's now May, and it probably is time to review the performances of your new hires at the beginning of the year and see if they pass their probation period.
In case that you find that some of those new hires did not perform to your expectations, you may want to review your hiring process so that you hire highly engaged and motivated staff with great attitude, and avoid those who could not fit in to your team.
Is it really possible to find the right candidate who is highly-engaged, self-motivated and has a great attitude as well?
We'll find out in this month's topics:
This issue's main article is on "How to Hire Highly Engaged Employees with Great Attitude", and we'll see how we can find the right employee in our hiring and interview process.
In brief:
To read the rest of this newsletter, pls. click here (http://www.psycheselling.com/page4.html.
You can also watch the Founder and CEO of Leadership IQ, Mark Murphy's interview in Shanghai with iTV-Asia on 13 Apr 2012, as he speaks about hiring challenges companies face, and why SMART goals can be really dumb. Click http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/eu8MSrD4tpw/ to watch it now.
Now you can provide year-long on-boarding training for your newly promoted managers for as low as US$123 each. Each on-boarding manager will receive training on how to be an effective leader and manager on 20 research-driven training modules throughout an entire year. Companies using this series of training include Microsoft, Ogilvy & Mather, Johnson & Johnson and may more. Find out more by e-mailing keyla@directions-consulting.com .
How to Hire Highly Engaged Employees with Great Attitude
by c.j. Ng
Based on recent studies by Leadership IQ tracking over 20,000 new hires, 46% of new hires will fail within 18 months. What is even more surprising than the failure rate, was that when new hires failed, 89% of the time it was for attitudinal reasons and only 11% of the time for a lack of skill. The attitudinal deficits include:
In our 2012 survey of 250 HR and hiring managers in China, we got the following responses:
Only 46.83% of the respondents' companies will When new employees don't perform to expectations, it's due to attitude (and not skills) in 51.83% of the time; Yet, 72.17% of the respondents based their hiring decisions on the skills and experience of the candidates, rather than their attitudes.
In fact, according to research conducted by Bó Lè Associates, China's average staff turnover rate was 20% in 2011, ranging from 11% to as high as 40%. China's HR and hiring managers can indeed do a lot to improve their hiring and staff retention performance.
As Herb Kelleher, former Southwest Airlines CEO used to say, “we can change skill levels through training, but we can’t change attitude.” Even if a new employee lacks the right skills, he can be trained if he has got great attitude and if he learns fast. On the other hand, if you hire someone with great skills but a lousy attitude, you have got yourself a "talented terror".
And talented terrors are a lot much harder to deal with.
So What Kind of People Do I Need?
While having a great attitude is important for your new hire
to succeed with your company, the attitudes that fit in a
company like
Google will be very different from the most
desired attitudes in a company like
Apple. You will
need to identify what kinds of attitudes will work best for
you, by finding out:
As you might have guessed it, you want to hire people with
the attitudes and behaviours displayed by your top
performers, and avoid hiring those that displayed similar
attitudes and behaviours as your bottom performers.
Sometimes, the desired
attitudes and behaviours of your new hires may even
differ in different departments and teams in your
company. You may need to some internal
interviewing of current top, middle and bottom
performers to find out what those behaviours and
attitudes are.
The Problem with Behavioural Interview Questions
Once you have identified the desired attitudes you are looking for in new hires, the next step will be how you can design the right questions so that you can spot them in interviews. This is actually very easily achieved, which unfortunately we usually screw up as we are being misled by so-called "behavioural-based interview" techniques.
Don't get
me wrong, interviewing for past behaviours is very important and
crucial in identifying the right attitudes. The only problem
here is that behaviour interview questions using the STAR
(Situation, Task, Action, Result) or BAR (Background, Action,
Result) actually leads the interviewee to give you the answer you'd
like to hear, instead of what actually happened.
Let me
explain.
A typical
behavioural interview question will go like “Could you tell me about
a time you lacked the skills or knowledge to complete an assignment
and how you overcame that.”
Now if you were to seek for the
results of the above action by asking "and how you
overcame that". it is in essence a leading question.
Smart candidates will know instantly what answers you
are looking for, and say what you want to hear, rather
than what actually happened.
An interview question that
gives you a glimpse of the candidate's attitude will
instead be like "“Could you tell me about a time you
lacked the skills or knowledge to complete an
assignment...”
Just leave the question hanging
and pause for the next 10 seconds. Let the
candidate fill in the void. Candidates with a
"problem-bringing" attitude will say something like:
“Happened all the time; that’s why I’m interviewing
with you guys.”
“I told them to find somebody else.”
“That’s why we have customer service - let them
figure it out.”
While candidates with a
"problem-solving" attitude are likely to say:
“I wasn’t afraid to admit that I lacked the skills I
needed and was easily able to find a peer who caught
me up to speed.”
“I enlisted the help of someone from corporate who
was familiar with the tool I did not know how to
use. I didn’t have to solve the problem from
scratch, and it sure felt good to share the credit
for a job well done.”
By the way, the above
statements are extracted from real candidates from
actual job interviews.
The Good, The Bad, and
the So-so Responses
It is sometimes said that interviewing is a skill that needs a long
time to master, and only the most skillful "master interviewers" can
see through if the candidate can perform on the job or not.
The fact is that most hiring processes have got at least 2 rounds of
interviews: one by the recruitment manager, and the other the line
manager of the employee. If any one of them is not a "master
interviewer", then you may either be missing your next top talent,
or you could be
hiring a complete dud.
The good news is, you can actually systematically come up with standard answers to your interview questions. For example, if your question is "Could you tell me about the most difficult colleague you dealt with?", some sample answers could be:
Example of bad answer: "Oh, there was this jerk that
does nothing but sucks up to the boss and takes all the
credit"
Example of a so-so answer: "Some people are just
difficult to deal with. Maybe our horoscopes don't
match. Generally, I just try to avoid getting into
conflicts with them."
Example of a good answer: "There was this colleague that
just insists on doing things his way and couldn't get
along with anyone. However, I always try to see
things from his point of view and give affirmation when
he was right. It's not easy, and I don't always
succeed, but at least we found some ways where we can
work together."
If such "standard questions" and "model answers" can be shared with
the respective interviewers, you then could achieve a level of
consistency of the candidates you hire.
Need help in
formulating your hiring strategy so that you achieve greater success
with your new hires? Simply e-mail
info@directions-consulting.com or
call +86-136 7190 2505 or Skype:
cydj001 and arrange to buy me a mocha. All information
shall be kept in confidence.
Power Breakfast Hour: 12 Jun 201
How to Hire Highly
Engaged Employees with Great Attitude
Why behavioural interview techniques such as "STAR" and "BAR" can actually lead the candidate to tell you what you want to hear, rather than telling you what actually happened; and
How by having a set of "standard questions and "model answers" you can make every interviewer in your company achieve a consistent level of hiring the best candidates with the best attitudes
VENUE: Crowne Plaza Shanghai • 400 Panyu Road (near Fahuazhen
Road) • 上海银星皇冠酒店 • 番禺路 400 号 (靠法华镇路)
PRICE: RMB 200 ONLY!
To make this a more conducive discussion, we are expecting a small
group of about 15 people only. The room can only take in 18, so
please register early to avoid disappointments. Please e-mail your
registrations to
sales@directions-consulting.com
Pls. check out our web sites
www.directions-consulting.com and
www.psycheselling.com/page4.html for more inspiration.
Upcoming Events
In case you'd like to know what other public events we have, here's
a snapshot of what's coming:
Simple and Practical Ways to Hire Highly
Engaged Employees with Great Attitude (Chinese)
Simple and Practical Ways to Hire Highly
Engaged Employees with Great Attitude (Chinese)
How to Lead and Motivate Your Gen Y Employees
to Exceptional Performance (Chinese)
How to Hire
High-Performance and Highly-Engaged Sales People
(Chinese)
How to Hire Highly
Engaged Employees with Great Attitude (English)
How to Make Your Own Movie to Develop Highly
Productive Corporate Cultures (Chinese)
Become the Leader that Everyone Wants to
Follow (Chinese)
Inspire and Influence Your
Employees to Exceptional Performance
Tips for Hiring Managers:
Have You Ever Thought About
the
Cost of Hiring the Wrong Salesperson?
By Barry Shamis
Edited by c.j. Ng
You hire John to sell in your Shanghai office. After a month it doesn't look good. After 90 days it is really bad. At six months you give up and let John go.
This all too familiar scenario happens time and time again. Unfortunately, you get lulled into believing that all you lost was six months of salary and benefits. Nothing could be further from the truth. In addition to salary and benefits you lost six full months of sales opportunities, management time, administrative costs and training costs. (See the list below for details)
There are both direct and indirect costs. Direct costs
relate to the leaving costs, replacement costs and
transitions costs, and indirect costs relate to the loss of
production, reduced performance levels, unnecessary overtime
and low morale.
How about your time? Would you have been more productive using your time working with someone who was generating revenue? (Cost 15% of your annual compensation ($17,000))
And the two real intangibles in this equation are employee morale and customer cost. Your good employees resent having a non-performer on the staff. It makes them look bad and they have to work harder as a result. And, there is cost with your customers as well. They have to deal with a sub-par person, which can sour the relationship. (Cost: What is the cost of one lost customer?)
Your cost of one hiring mistake is roughly $302,000 without
counting the cost of low employee morale or lost customers.
And here is the really sad part, if you do make this hiring
mistake, you have to do it all over again doubling all the
numbers! How does $604,000 for each hiring mistake
sound? Click
here to use the Real Cost Calculator of Hiring
Mistakes to determine your actual exposure.
Now you can see why the "hire a bunch and keep a few"
staffing strategy is a mistake. The good news is you
are on your way to fixing the situation as we speak.
The first step in putting a great hiring process in place is
to understand that you need one. Once you realize the
economic impact on your business, you're ready to take the
steps necessary to get on track.
Your best next step is to invest in your education.
The more you know about recruiting and hiring good sales
people, the better chance you have of
building a winning
sales team. If you are not expanding your knowledge
base, and when you compete against someone who is, then the
outcome is fairly certain.
"A top quartile performing salesperson is 14 times more
productive than an average performer."
If you would like to find out how you can hire the right sales
person for your team, you can
e-mail
info@directions-consulting.com or
call +86-136 7190 2505 or Skype:
cydj001
About
Directions Management Consulting is the partner of
LeadershipIQ in China and Asia.
LeadershipIQ helps more than 125,000 leaders every year through the facts drawn from one of the largest ongoing leadership studies ever conducted is used to help companies apply resources where the best possible results be achieved.
In addition, Directions Management Consulting is a leading provider of sales performance, innovation and experiential learning solutions in China and many parts of Asia.
Raybattle is the strategic partner of Directions
Management Consulting specialising in experiential learning events
and management retreats.
Currently, Directions Management Consulting has served
clients such as InterContinental Hotels Group, Unilever, Bristol-Myers Squibb,
Roche, Philips Lighting, Carrier, Ingersoll Rand, Freudenberg etc.
Through collaboration with consultancies such as
Forum
Corporation,
MTI,
de Bono
China,
ProWay etc., the consultants in
Directions Management Consulting have served clients such as PwC,
Air Products, Evonik, Wacker, Epson amongst others.
Directions Management Consulting will increase its efforts
to conduct leadership studies in China and other parts of Asia, so that more companies apply resources where the best possible results be achieved
in this part of the world.
Enquiries and suggestions, pls. e-mail
info@directions-consulting.com or visit
www.directions-consulting.com
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mailing Address: Shui Cheng Nan Road 51 Lane No. 9 Suite 202 Shanghai 201103 China |